Well If you watched the interview like I did and the  clip is all over the place , its hard to come to that conclusion.

I thought it was inappropriate to the Kennedy's in light of what Ted is going through and she apologized to the family .

However some people just keep trying to drag Obama into it when she wasn't even talking about him at all.

It is very fascinating.

I don't believe that for one second. But it reveals a mind set. A mind set we must now go beyond.

i agree with almost all that your diary said.  one problem though, an BO campaign statement came out shortly after the comments were made that actually blew this thing up before later backing off of it.

As lori said you have to bring that view in with you, it is not in the video.

It isn't the Hillary supporters that are outraged by the comments.  However, Hillary supporters writing or calling the MSM on this won't make a difference.  Obama supporters would - you know, unity?

When Hillary supporters went on TV and blogs and talked about sexism, the MSM shat all over it and said oh, no we didn't.  However, if both sides went on TV & talked about it, it would have been taken more seriously.

Same thing here.  The people who support her can't complain, because they get called whiners and sour grapes, all that stuff.

but that is what is so creepy about it.

It's the cheerleading, the fanboy/girl attitude.  

Clinton supporters mock Obama supporters for their starry eyed adoration of Obama and then turn around and have the same attitude about Clinton.  It's disturbing to see (no matter who it's about).  The left isn't SUPPOSED to be about blind adoration of our politicians.  That's the Right's forte.  We're supposed to be demanding of dems.  Supportive but critical.  That's supposed to be OUR forte.

This is just disturbing in the extreme to watch.

No one invoked the "assassination" of either candidate here.  She was clearly using examples to illustrate her point that anything can happen in politics.  I acknowledge her choice of examples may have been inartful, if for no other reason than her rabid haters are starving for anything to fight about since she's been so conciliatory over the past month.  

Do your own research.  The exit polls are ubiquitous but for further and more demonstrable evidence on this topic, check the county-by-county returns for any of the elections post-Wright.  Pennsylvania, Indiana, North Carolina, Kentucky, West Virginia, Oregon.  

Over 90% of the African American vote, and the only non AA's he performs well with are the affluent & students, also known broadly as academia.  

Well, it seems Obama supporters are thrilled with this because it gives them a specious excuse to do what they do best: complaining.

There are certainly some who appear to be waiting for Obama to get on his knees, but I'll certainly take the time to engage any Hillary supporter who wants to hear why I support Obama and not McCain.

You probably will, too, Hadrian, but dammit there are some people on this site who are making it so difficult, especially with him winning.  We only need the reasonable democrat Clinton supporters.  These nutjobs can stay home (despite the fact that they'll suffer with a McCain presidency and benefit from an Obama presidency just like everyone else).

What a bunch of filth,

Well, sweetheart, I hope you like you high-and-mighty moral superiority -
Because it just ain't my vote that Obama is losing.

Today's episode, and Obama's immediate rush to characterize it as -

"Senator Clinton's statement before the Argus Leader editorial board
was unfortunate and has no place in this campaign,"

Was a deliberate attempt to escalate and polarize the issue.

So, yes, there was involvement by Obama's campaign.

And, guess what?
After all the pooh-poohing of working-class whites and Hispanics by Brazile among others - the beyond-the-pale bigotry directed at Clinton supporters in Rust Belt states - it will be with great pleasure that I watch Obama's campaign crash and burn.  You really don't expect them to turn around and then vote for Obama, do you?

It's Lamont all over again.  Lieberman supporters were called everything in the book and then some, but Lamont had to win over a chunk of them to prevail.  What a friggin' brilliant strategy!
Except that the Clintons are the "Great Evil" now, instead of Lieberman.  Always have to have a bogeyman/woman - don't you?

Well, honey, the general; election ain't the Democratic primaries.
No caucuses.  No white liberal guilt votes.
No hands off Obama's lack of experience and questionable judgements.

It's gonna be ugly.
Of course, we Clinton supporters will be sipping our tea
and commenting with fascination about the events -
as disinterested onlookers.

OMG how typical of the very far left.

"We don't care if you don't vote for us because you're all stupid and ornery!"

1972, 1984, 1988, 2004, 2008...